*scottstuff* : Nikon D2X? /blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x?format=rss en-us 40 Comment on Nikon D2X? by Tim <p>From the Nikon friend :):</p> <p>I&#8217;m waiting to see images out of D2X. Now that we have the real stats for both the 1Ds Mk II and the D2X, I would say that they&#8217;re &#8220;pretty close&#8221; in terms of stats (except price: the Canon is 60% more).</p> <p>It&#8217;s no longer like Nikon D1X vs. Canon 1Ds (which was easy - Canon wins). I think it&#8217;s more what system you&#8217;re used to. All my Nikonian friends can&#8217;t stand Canon&#8217;s ergonomics; I&#8217;m sure the Canonians probably feel the same about Nikon.</p> <p>Also, although it seems everyone forgets or doesn&#8217;t mention this, there is one nice advantage to the DX format size: you get to use the really nice part of the glass. And you don&#8217;t have the non-trivial angle-of-incidence problems that are inherent with electronic sensors (can you say &#8220;color fringing&#8221;, 1DS fans? Hope they&#8217;ve improved the microlenses!).</p> <p>Of course, from what we know about CMOS properties, it would seem that the 1Ds MkII may have better high ISO performance than the Nikon. But I&#8217;m waiting to see some images.</p> Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:24:00 -0700 urn:uuid:db9a0780e61c12f3ea5b66f9adc8fd07 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1268 Comment on Nikon D2X? by sandeep <p>Well I am tired of reading comments nikon vs canon. In my opinion canon is a leopeard, hunts faster, eats faster, digest faster. But still If I think to be more secured I would choose a LION &#8220;The NIKON&#8221;</p> Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:35:50 -0800 urn:uuid:3ca758e2d64301abe42a227ad5384f50 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1269 Comment on Nikon D2X? by Heck <p>For me and my group, it is a matter of preference. You get used to a certain brand and your hand just feels in place, and that&#8217;s it, you can be stuck for life with that manufacturer&#8217;s line. Ergonomics is always subjective.</p> <p>I have both brands and I tend to see better results with my Nikons. It is not just the speed, it is the result that matters. It is not the size of megapixels, it is how you photograph.</p> <p>I know this Canon-Nikon discussion will go on and on and on, but in the end, it is the pictures that matter - the results! </p> Fri, 27 May 2005 13:14:51 -0700 urn:uuid:b402c116d3b95b6fead94bf8ad35dc51 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1270 Comment on Nikon D2X? by Heck <p>For me and my group, it is a matter of preference. You get used to a certain brand and your hand just feels in place, and that&#8217;s it, you can be stuck for life with that manufacturer&#8217;s line. Ergonomics is always subjective.</p> <p>I have both brands and I tend to see better results with my Nikons. It is not just the speed, it is the result that matters. It is not the size of megapixels, it is how you photograph.</p> <p>I know this Canon-Nikon discussion will go on and on and on, but in the end, it is the pictures that matter - the results! </p> Fri, 27 May 2005 13:18:26 -0700 urn:uuid:fe72c12031977ff68edc4ac327bf69e6 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1271 Comment on Nikon D2X? by Heck <p>For me and my group, it is a matter of preference. You get used to a certain brand and your hand just feels in place, and that&#8217;s it, you can be stuck for life with that manufacturer&#8217;s line. Ergonomics is always subjective.</p> <p>I have both brands and I tend to see better results with my Nikons. It is not just the speed, it is the result that matters. It is not the size of megapixels, it is how you photograph.</p> <p>I know this Canon-Nikon discussion will go on and on and on, but in the end, it is the pictures that matter - the results! </p> Fri, 27 May 2005 13:18:35 -0700 urn:uuid:3832fa0b9d540f61120ec64b777f0ad3 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1589 Comment on Nikon D2X? by Heck <p>For me and my group, it is a matter of preference. You get used to a certain brand and your hand just feels in place, and that&#8217;s it, you can be stuck for life with that manufacturer&#8217;s line. Ergonomics is always subjective.</p> <p>I have both brands and I tend to see better results with my Nikons. It is not just the speed, it is the result that matters. It is not the size of megapixels, it is how you photograph.</p> <p>I know this Canon-Nikon discussion will go on and on and on, but in the end, it is the pictures that matter - the results! </p> Fri, 27 May 2005 13:18:37 -0700 urn:uuid:25d2cf52b6e9307c2855b8998dfb9426 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-520 Comment on Nikon D2X? by fuscophoto.com <p>Canon Advantages:</p> <p>Less Noise Full Frame Camera More Megapixels 2 Card slots</p> <p>Nikon Advantages</p> <p>Better @ Long Exposures (Less Noise) Better Flash system/Wireless Flash Control Sharper Images (espescially @ longer focal length)</p> <p>I was debating this whole jump to Canon because of the extra noise in the D2X; however, the on camera noise reduction as well as the Nikon software will eat up that noise if needed. The image is sharper because the camera uses the best part of the lens (1.5 Magnification) and the system is $3000 less than the canon. I think the 1Ds Mark II is slightly better because of the option of 2 card slots, a waterproof body, and a larger sensor; but not significantly enough better to need to spend the extra loot! For the difference in price you can get a DX 2.8 fisheye (10.5 equal to 16mm) and you&#8217;d still have money left to buy a 80-200 2.8 VR. NIKON! NIKON! NIKON! 4 megapixels don&#8217;t make you any better, it&#8217;s the lens and the lights. Save your money, something betters coming out next year anyway.</p> Mon, 22 Aug 2005 05:54:16 -0700 urn:uuid:9bd18c49a68721c9c16aad5428a6ad49 http://scottstuff.net/blog/2004/09/15/nikon-d2x#comment-1272