scottstuff : SHA-1 Broken

Comment on SHA-1 Broken by mirabile

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:03:46 -0800

Suggest moving to RIPEMD-160?

From what I’ve heard, SHA-2 (SHA-384/512) is not more secure than SHA-1 except for the greater length, but RIPEMD-160 (in contrast to RIPEMD) still looks great.

Any cryptographers know about it? (I’d like to hear from you, even per eMail.)

Btw, RIPEMD-160 is better than SHA-1 anyway, because it’s from Europe ;-)

PS: This is the first time I consider commenting a blog…

Comment on SHA-1 Broken by core

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 04:10:28 -0800

Far out… I eagerly await more detail…

peace, core

Comment on SHA-1 Broken by Uri

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 07:40:42 -0800

We should shift attention from MD5- and SHA-based MAC design to block cipher-based MAC/MDC.

Comment on SHA-1 Broken by porky

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 23:30:52 -0800

MD4, MD5, HAVAL-128 and RIPEMD already found broken in CRYPTO’04.

http://eprint.iacr.org/2004/199.pdf

Comment on SHA-1 Broken by neel

Thu, 15 Dec 2005 02:02:48 -0800

the same team had broken the MD5 earlier…seems its the programmer’s generic “am god” syndrome