A new server (part 1)

Posted by Scott Laird Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:56:19 GMT

A few days ago, I mentioned that my home NAS box had failed, and that I was considering replacing it with a PC server running OpenSolaris and ZFS. I’ve read a pile of ZFS docs, and it looks like the best option available to me today, so I decided to order some suitable hardware.

At that point, pretty much everything broke down. I have a hard enough time keeping track of which hardware works with Linux this week, and OpenSolaris is completely new to me. Sun’s list of officially-supported hardware is pretty sparse, and digging through their mailing list archives gets frustrating quickly. From what I can tell, it boils down to:

  • Current Intel and AMD CPUs are all fine.
  • Most of Intel’s chipsets are fine.
  • Most of nVidia’s AMD chipsets are fine.
  • nVidia and Intel video chips are good.
  • Most common Ethernet chipsets are either supported natively or have drivers available.
  • The only SATA controllers that work are Intel’s ICH southbridges, Silicon Image’s PCI and PCI-E chips, Marvell’s PCI chips, and nVidia’s southbridges. It’s not clear that Marvell’s PCI-E chips work. Most motherboards with additional, non-southbridge SATA ports probably won’t work.
  • Venturing too far outside of this list will probably result in problems.

I was looking for a motherboard with 8 SATA ports, and was hoping that the Intel D975XBX2 (“Bad Axe 2”) would work, but 4 of its 8 SATA ports belong to a Marvell PCI-E SATA chip that doesn’t appear to be supported. I went through every single 8-port motherboard in Newegg’s (the ‘WS’ is important–the P5K is a different board). It only has 6 on-board SATA ports, but it includes a PCI-X slot. That’ll let me use the Supermicro AOC-SAT2-MV8, which is far and away the cheapest 8-port SATA card on the market. That’ll give me a total of 14 SATA ports, which should be enough for a whatever I want to throw at it. The Marvell PCI-X chip at the heart of the Supermicro card is the same one used in Sun’s Sun Fire x4500 48-drive server, so it’s safe to assume that Sun has put a lot of effort into the driver.

Most of the test of the system is fairly generic–a cheap nVidia 7200GS video card (the cheapest PCI-E card that NewEgg carries), a nice case and power supply, RAM, and a boatload of drives.

The one odd component that I’ve added is a Gigabyte GC-RAMDISK with 1 GB of RAM. The GC-RAMDISK is a battery-backed SATA ramdisk; it looks like a hard drive to the system and can survive up to 18 hours without power. I’ve had my eye on this thing for years, and it looks like it’ll be a perfect external log device for GFS. I had to ask to see how ZFS will behave if the device fails, and it looks like manual intervention may be required after an 18+ hour power outage, but it should be pretty minimal. I’m planning on posting some benchmarks here once I’ve had a chance to try it out.

Assuming that I’m able to get this whole mess to work at all, I should have lots to write about here over the next week or so. I’m going to start by explaining why I want to use Solaris instead of Linux or *BSD, and why I’m building something instead of buying a pre-build NAS box.

Tags , , , ,  | 3 comments

Comments

  1. Alex said 1 day later:

    Thanks for the write-up. I for one am very interested in all of this. I currently run a Linux based NAS box with a minimal raid-1 configuration and will be adding a lot more storage and would like something more substantial so I have the choice of either building on the Linux setup I have or starting from scratch so will be following your series of articles very closely.

  2. Chris said 1 day later:

    http://www.norcotek.com/item_detail.php?categoryid=8&modelno=ds-520#

  3. Doug Alcorn said 1 day later:

    Yea, Chris, those things look nice. There seem to be at least three or four similar devices. The short-coming seems to be how many internal disks you can get in it. I should let Scott speak for himself; but earlier he complained about what seems like a raid-5 setup that failed because it only had one spare disk and he had two drive failures. So with 5 internal bays, I think you could only get like 1TB of storage. I’m not sure how much Scott thinks he needs, but my guess is he’s going for more than that.

(leave url/email »)

   Comment Markup Help Preview comment